The electoral politics of the Liberal-Conservative Coalition Government

Coalition politics is a familiar process in most European countries. There are no guarantees of the final results, as polling day can bring many unexpected outcomes, sometimes generating month-long negotiations requiring grand coalitions of parties drawn from across the political spectrum in order to cobble together a government. Nevertheless during the election campaign, European parties often signal their willingness to collaborate with potential coalition partners, and which parties are outside this process, providing voters with clues about the eventual outcome.

In the United Kingdom, however, the British government coalition joining the fate of the Liberal Democrat and Conservative parties, announced yesterday in the Rose Garden of No 10, seems to have been utterly serendipitous for all concerned, even to commentators, pundits and the party leaders involved at the heart of this process. The outcome, the first governing coalition in Britain since the end of World War II, and the first ever Conservative-Liberal Democratic coalition in history, was unexpected despite the long series of public opinion polls predicting a hung parliament. It was agreed by the party leaders only during the five days of negotiations following the election, after it became apparent that the Conservatives were the largest party at Westminster but without an overall parliamentary majority.

Why the surprise?

In terms of ideological and policy positions, for a decade the Liberal Democrats and the Labour party have always been closer; indeed in the 2001 and 2005 elections, the Comparative Manifesto Project estimated that the Liberal Democrat manifesto was more progressive and slightly to the left of the Labour party platform, especially on issues of taxation and proposed levels of social welfare spending. By contrast, although the Conservatives have moved closer to the center of the British political spectrum under the leadership of David Cameron, nevertheless they remained further to the right of their other main rivals. And on certain issues, notably Europe, the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives remain miles apart.

But how are the parties placed by voters? Did the coalition, and the decision by Nick Clegg to join with the Conservatives rather than Labour, reflect the outcome that the British public wanted? During election night, Paddy Ashdown famously said that the people have spoken, but we still don't know what they have said. One problem was that the main exit polls, commissioned by all the major media organizations, failed to ask any questions beyond voting. So the coalition has generated a mountain of speculations offered by all sides but no systematic evidence. Those reading the tea-leaves often claimed that the British public 'wanted' a hung parliament but, in fact, this cannot be deduced from the outcome. Each citizen cast a particular vote in their specific constituency, but the final outcome was the collective result of millions of independent decisions.

One way we can throw light on this question is to turn to the 2010 British Election Study (BES) which has just been released. The BES data provides some revealing clues about what the electorate actually preferred. And in particular the results tell us something important about the second choice of Liberal Democrat voters. If the decision about entering a coalition with either Labour or the Conservatives were in the hands of Liberal Democrat voters, what would they have wanted?

The table below, drawn from the BES campaign panel survey among 1,355 respondents, reports how people voted on May 6^th and also reveals their second choice preference among those who voted but who really preferred another party. Among those in this group who cast a ballot for the Liberal Democrats, only 12% opted for the Conservative party as their second choice preference. By contrast, almost half the Liberal Democrat voters (48%) chose Labour as their second preference. Likewise, the Liberal Democrats were the 2^nd choice preference of four out of ten Labour voters.

In other words, it is not simply that the Labour and the Liberal Democrats parties are far closer in their manifesto policies and ideological values, but Liberal Democrat and Labour voters also recognized the close affinity in their willingness to switch votes. The Conservative party was in a far different position, where UKIP (to the right of the party) were their largest 2^nd choice party.

Thus the new coalition governing British politics has clearly shaken up the old pattern of British party politics. Whether the decision of the leaders will cause Liberal Democrat voters to move gradually closer towards the Conservatives in their electoral sympathies, or whether instead the Liberal Democratic party will eventually be punished by their supporters for entering this alliance, remains a fascinating question which only time will tell.

	How people voted on May 6th 2010
Among those who preferred another party	Conservative voter	Labour voter	Lib-Dem voter
Con 2nd choice	13	2	12
Lab 2nd choice	4	22	48
Lib-Dem 2nd choice	21	43	15
SNP 2nd choice	1	4	3
PC 2nd choice	0	2	1
UKIP 2nd choice	41	8	4
BNP 2nd choice	10	6	1
Green 2nd choice	2	9	11
Other 2nd choice	10	6	6
	100	100	100

Source: British Election Study 2010 Campaign Panel. F/w YouGov. N. 1,355

Comments

[karen millen dresses]

I think the Race Between Education and Technology by Caludia Goldin and Lawrence Katz has been often cited for this explanation.

[Hvac System Training]

Your essay is good, I'm glad to determine this type of a fantastic internet site.

[Pimples]

I like your articles, hoped later on to determine much more of this type of a fantastic write-up.

[Payday loans online]

There is nothing a man happier than when they conquered a new challenge or a new area, make every day and probably the main factor that makes the existence of these activities a reality.

[debt consolidation]

Nevertheless during the election campaign, European parties often signal their willingness to collaborate with potential coalition partners..

[solar electricity]

Manifesto Project estimated that the Liberal Democrat manifesto was more progressive and slightly to the left of the Labour party platform,

[sanitizing mats]

The team, which includes two tagalongs who are not experienced cave divers, is forced to find another way out, if they can survive.

[Mobile Naruto]

It can bolt the people’s eye afterimage is a diplomacy point for a developed to achieve them seductive.

[fishing tackle]

Democrats, only 12% opted for the Conservative party as their second choice preference. By contrast, almost half the Liberal.

[Great Plains Lending]

litany of global leaders such as Sweden, Norway and Finland, as well as European democracies such as Spain.

[debt consolidation]

The team, which includes two tagalongs who are not experienced cave divers, is forced to find another way out, if they can survive.

[quotes and sayings]

I would like to personally thank you for taking the time to write, in depth, on the process of creating an article efficiently and effectively for blog readers

[Cruceros]

You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this topic to be really something which I think I would never understand

[Payday loans online]

David Cameron, nevertheless they remained further to the right of their other main rivals. And on certain issues, notably Europe, the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives remain miles apart.

[cash advance loan no faxing]

Nevertheless during the election campaign, European parties often signal their willingness to collaborate with potential coalition partners,

[TrackWhatMatters.com]

Ever felt like strangling someone with your stethoscope? Then you’ve probably just heard one of these 10 things.

[cartomanzia]

David Cameron, nevertheless they remained further to the right of their other main rivals. And on certain issues, notably Europe, the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives remain miles apart.

[Magic of Making Up]

or whether instead the Liberal Democratic party will eventually be punished by their supporters for entering this alliance, remains a fascinating question which only time will tell.

[greenhouses]

This is a smart blog. I mean it. You have so much knowledge about this issue, and so much passion. You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses.

[Templatesspot.com]

this is really nice to read..informative post is very good to read..thanks a lot!

[Canada Goose Coats]

Your essay is good, I'm glad to determine this type of a fantastic internet site

[Canada Goose Jacket]

I like your articles, hoped later on to determine much more of this type of a fantastic write-up

[land for sale in Kent]

This was a really great contest and hopefully I can attend the next one. It was alot of fun and I really enjoyed myself.. thanks

[Farmland for sale]

I dont know what to say. This blog is fantastic. Thats not really a really huge statement, but its all I could come up with after reading this. You know so much about this subject. So much so that you made me want to learn more about it. Your blog is my stepping stone, my friend. Thanks for the heads up on this subject.
thank you

[land for sale Devon]

British public wanted? During election night, Paddy Ashdown famously said that the people have spoken, but we still don't know what they have said.
thanks

[escort]

In a sense, this is all water under the bridge. But there are still important issues which need to be addressed.

[Dean]

Are the goverment coalition is the effective way to improve our country? I think it must be better life for our country after the coalition :)

[Eyebrow Threading]

Nevertheless during the election campaign, European parties often signal their willingness to collaborate with potential coalition partners..

[Canada Goose Jackets]

The article was well written, I agree with your point of view

[Sim Taxi]

It is very nice article,,It is great article,I really very much impressed ,Thanks for sharing.