Coalition politics is a familiar process in most European countries. There are no guarantees of the final results, as polling day can bring many unexpected outcomes, sometimes generating month-long negotiations requiring grand coalitions of parties drawn from across the political spectrum in order to cobble together a government. Nevertheless during the election campaign, European parties often signal their willingness to collaborate with potential coalition partners, and which parties are outside this process, providing voters with clues about the eventual outcome.
In the United Kingdom, however, the British government coalition joining the fate of the Liberal Democrat and Conservative parties, announced yesterday in the Rose Garden of No 10, seems to have been utterly serendipitous for all concerned, even to commentators, pundits and the party leaders involved at the heart of this process. The outcome, the first governing coalition in Britain since the end of World War II, and the first ever Conservative-Liberal Democratic coalition in history, was unexpected despite the long series of public opinion polls predicting a hung parliament. It was agreed by the party leaders only during the five days of negotiations following the election, after it became apparent that the Conservatives were the largest party at Westminster but without an overall parliamentary majority.
Why the surprise?
In terms of ideological and policy positions, for a decade the Liberal Democrats and the Labour party have always been closer; indeed in the 2001 and 2005 elections, the Comparative Manifesto Project estimated that the Liberal Democrat manifesto was more progressive and slightly to the left of the Labour party platform, especially on issues of taxation and proposed levels of social welfare spending. By contrast, although the Conservatives have moved closer to the center of the British political spectrum under the leadership of David Cameron, nevertheless they remained further to the right of their other main rivals. And on certain issues, notably Europe, the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives remain miles apart.
But how are the parties placed by voters? Did the coalition, and the decision by Nick Clegg to join with the Conservatives rather than Labour, reflect the outcome that the British public wanted? During election night, Paddy Ashdown famously said that the people have spoken, but we still don't know what they have said. One problem was that the main exit polls, commissioned by all the major media organizations, failed to ask any questions beyond voting. So the coalition has generated a mountain of speculations offered by all sides but no systematic evidence. Those reading the tea-leaves often claimed that the British public 'wanted' a hung parliament but, in fact, this cannot be deduced from the outcome. Each citizen cast a particular vote in their specific constituency, but the final outcome was the collective result of millions of independent decisions.
One way we can throw light on this question is to turn to the 2010 British Election Study (BES) which has just been released. The BES data provides some revealing clues about what the electorate actually preferred. And in particular the results tell us something important about the second choice of Liberal Democrat voters. If the decision about entering a coalition with either Labour or the Conservatives were in the hands of Liberal Democrat voters, what would they have wanted?
The table below, drawn from the BES campaign panel survey among 1,355 respondents, reports how people voted on May 6th and also reveals their second choice preference among those who voted but who really preferred another party. Among those in this group who cast a ballot for the Liberal Democrats, only 12% opted for the Conservative party as their second choice preference. By contrast, almost half the Liberal Democrat voters (48%) chose Labour as their second preference. Likewise, the Liberal Democrats were the 2nd choice preference of four out of ten Labour voters.
In other words, it is not simply that the Labour and the Liberal Democrats parties are far closer in their manifesto policies and ideological values, but Liberal Democrat and Labour voters also recognized the close affinity in their willingness to switch votes. The Conservative party was in a far different position, where UKIP (to the right of the party) were their largest 2nd choice party.
Thus the new coalition governing British politics has clearly shaken up the old pattern of British party politics. Whether the decision of the leaders will cause Liberal Democrat voters to move gradually closer towards the Conservatives in their electoral sympathies, or whether instead the Liberal Democratic party will eventually be punished by their supporters for entering this alliance, remains a fascinating question which only time will tell.
How people voted on May 6th 2010 | |||
Among those who preferred another party | Conservative voter | Labour voter | Lib-Dem voter |
Con 2nd choice | 13 | 2 | 12 |
Lab 2nd choice | 4 | 22 | 48 |
Lib-Dem 2nd choice | 21 | 43 | 15 |
SNP 2nd choice | 1 | 4 | 3 |
PC 2nd choice | 0 | 2 | 1 |
UKIP 2nd choice | 41 | 8 | 4 |
BNP 2nd choice | 10 | 6 | 1 |
Green 2nd choice | 2 | 9 | 11 |
Other 2nd choice | 10 | 6 | 6 |
100 | 100 | 100 | |
Source: British Election Study 2010 Campaign Panel. F/w YouGov. N. 1,355
The article contained in the email took such a harsh tone toward Perry, I assumed, for a brief moment, that a liberal interest group was quickly jumping on the newest entrant in the Republican presidential field. Thanks for sharing the informative post.
masters of education online
Posted by: A Facebook User | May 10, 2012 at 02:16 AM
Democratic party will eventually be punished by their supporters for entering this alliance, remains a fascinating question which only time will tell.
Posted by: www.bestonlinepokies.com.au | May 09, 2012 at 06:10 AM
By contrast, almost half the Liberal Democrat voters (48%) chose Labour as their second preference. Likewise, the Liberal Democrats were the 2nd choice preference of four out of ten Labour voters.
Posted by: empresas de mudanças em sp | May 08, 2012 at 09:37 AM
Good stuff as per usual, thanks. I do hope this kind of thing gets more exposure
Posted by: gucci bolsos | May 07, 2012 at 01:10 AM
I find life an exciting business,The point is succinctness of expression.
Posted by: louis vuitton | May 07, 2012 at 01:10 AM
I love this page but i also want to introduce my blog to you
Thank you, for all your work but the hassle was worth it
Posted by: Louis Vuitton Pas Cher | May 07, 2012 at 01:09 AM
I have been searching for this quality blogs regarding this niche.Searching in Yahoo drove me here, I just found this kind of satisfactory readings i was looking for
Posted by: Naples | May 06, 2012 at 04:49 PM
party will eventually be punished by their supporters for entering this alliance, remains a fascinating question which only time will tell.
Posted by: Miraweb | May 06, 2012 at 07:56 AM
Each citizen cast a particular vote in their specific constituency, but the final outcome was the collective result of millions of independent decisions.
Posted by: empresas de mudanças em sp | May 05, 2012 at 11:00 AM
Nevertheless during the election campaign, European parties often signal their willingness to collaborate with potential coalition partners, and which parties are outside this process, providing voters with clues about the eventual outcome.
Posted by: Presente Dia das Mães | May 04, 2012 at 04:11 PM
The article contained in the email took such a harsh tone toward Perry, I assumed, for a brief moment, that a liberal interest group was quickly jumping on the newest entrant in the Republican presidential field. Thanks for sharing the informative post.
Posted by: empresas de mudanças em sp | May 04, 2012 at 03:50 PM
Nevertheless during the election campaign, European parties often signal their willingness to collaborate with potential coalition partners, and which parties are outside this process, providing voters with clues about the eventual outcome.
Posted by: online pokie games | May 04, 2012 at 01:12 PM
In an interview with Beet.TV, Murray explains how the iPad has enabled a growing audience to watch greater amounts of both short and long form video.
Posted by: play online pokies | May 04, 2012 at 10:25 AM
The table below, drawn from the BES campaign panel survey among 1,355 respondents, reports how people voted on May 6th and also reveals their second choice preference among those who voted but who really preferred another party. Among those in this group who cast a ballot for the Liberal Democrats, only 12% opted for the Conservative party as their second choice preference. By contrast, almost half the Liberal Democrat voters (48%) chose Labour as their second preference. Likewise, the Liberal Democrats were the 2nd choice preference of four out of ten Labour voters.
Posted by: best online pokies | May 04, 2012 at 09:55 AM
I hope you can continue this type of hard work to this site in future also..Because this blog is really very informative and it helps me lot. I harmonise with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your incoming updates.
Posted by: online masters in health administration | May 04, 2012 at 07:52 AM
I would have to disagree not only with the opinions that were made in this entry but I would also like to disagree with some of the comments that were made I think you should know more about the topic before writing on it.
Posted by: pokies machines | May 04, 2012 at 07:21 AM
The Wall Street Journal would not be delivering its three and a half hours of programming if it were not for the iPad, says Alan Murray, Deputy Managing Editor of the Wall Street Journal and Executive Editor of the WSJ.com.
Posted by: mobile casino games | May 04, 2012 at 05:56 AM
Comparative Manifesto Project estimated that the Liberal Democrat manifesto was more progressive and slightly to the left of the Labour.
Posted by: australian online pokies | May 04, 2012 at 05:49 AM
It is really fantastic to read this post. I helped me very much because I am finding this. Thanks so much for the informative article and hope that you will have good posts like this
Posted by: project management software | May 03, 2012 at 11:06 PM
Distance is really an important factor to take into account when we are looking for school for the kids. If the school is too far away,I love the opinions that you have added to this piece I really like to read your blog.
Posted by: EuroConsult FZE | May 03, 2012 at 01:33 PM
By contrast, although the Conservatives have moved closer to the center of the British political spectrum under the leadership of David Cameron, nevertheless they remained further to the right of their other main rivals. And on certain issues, notably Europe, the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives remain miles apart.
Posted by: empresas de mudanças em sp | May 03, 2012 at 07:06 AM
You are an overly skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look ahead to looking for extra of your great post. I feel really happy and grateful for giving me such valuable post. Magia Blanca
Posted by: Magia Blanca | May 03, 2012 at 02:37 AM
“And so it has been, and so it is written
On the doorway to paradise
That those who falter and those who fall
Must pay the price”
Posted by: Justin Bieber Supra | May 02, 2012 at 02:47 AM
thank you for the tips and tricks,,, very useful tips..
Posted by: fondos de pantalla para android | April 28, 2012 at 08:57 PM
European parties often signal their willingness to collaborate with potential coalition partners, and which parties are outside this process, providing voters with clues about the eventual outcome.
Posted by: cervejas importadas | April 28, 2012 at 06:44 AM
The article contained in the email took such a harsh tone toward Perry, I assumed, for a brief moment, that a liberal interest group was quickly jumping on the newest entrant in the Republican presidential field. Thanks for sharing the informative post.
Posted by: customized necklaces | April 26, 2012 at 03:19 AM
Liberal conservatism is a variant of political conservatism which incorporates liberal elements. Emerging research suggests personality traits and even political orientation are linked to preferred use and corresponding size variance of different areas. Thanks for sharing the informative post.
Posted by: hamsa necklace | April 25, 2012 at 07:41 PM
A lot of times it is very hard to get that perfect balance between user friendliness and visual appearance
Posted by: Hvac Systems | April 25, 2012 at 01:56 PM
Your blog is very beautiful, the style is very cool! See the things that I think is very interested in oh, thank you for sharing! I wish you good luck!
Posted by: Pimples | April 25, 2012 at 01:54 PM
Thank you so much for letting us know about this ! I must say that you are a very dedicated person to have written a wonderful post like this.
Posted by: Sim Taxi | April 25, 2012 at 01:52 PM